We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Political Poll #1; Cast your vote!
Topic Started: May 7 2004, 10:34 AM (489 Views)
Wiedle
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Ya, I think that Bush could have done a few things a little differently.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
UnderBlade
Member Avatar
Chamillionaire
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Yes, who would stop this chaos?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Grim
aka :)
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Yes i do!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nate
Member Avatar
mieux que vous
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Ryan
May 7 2004, 02:57 PM
Of course it was right. We aren't going to sit around and play guessing games if we have a speculation that Saddam is withholding weapons of mass destruction, now are we?

We have no proof there are those weapons which is why I voted no. There was no real reason or proof good enough to send them out. And what has happened? Nothing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
the format
Member Avatar
Liberate says: format your legs are so hawt
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Yeah, they were gonna bomb us so we had to take them out.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nate
Member Avatar
mieux que vous
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Did we have any proof of those bombs or that there was even a plan to bomb us?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
the format
Member Avatar
Liberate says: format your legs are so hawt
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Who are you gonna trust? Bush? or Saddam?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Adamo
Member Avatar
P-b-b-b-bleeeease...
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I think it was a right desiscion, Sadaam had to be stopped.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
bobguy911
Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
if theAre were bombs
i think we would of found them already
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Wiedle
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
True, but Iraqs pretty big, and there are lots of place to hide bombs. Or they could have destroyed them.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Quimby
Member Avatar
dood
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Nate
May 8 2004, 05:28 AM
Ryan
May 7 2004, 02:57 PM
Of course it was right. We aren't going to sit around and play guessing games if we have a speculation that Saddam is withholding weapons of mass destruction, now are we?

We have no proof there are those weapons which is why I voted no. There was no real reason or proof good enough to send them out. And what has happened? Nothing.

But if something did happen...I'm sure you'd have a whole new perspective.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2