| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Bits and Bytes FAQ; Numbers are Fun :) | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 25 2004, 12:19 AM (1,354 Views) | |
| Stefan-ZNR | Jul 30 2004, 06:51 PM Post #31 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes But as in kilobyte, no, there isn't. A picobyte would be 10-12 byte, a millionth of a millionth of a byte. A byte is eight bits, and a bit is the smallest unit, so you can't go smaller than 1/8th of a byte. |
![]() |
|
| Order Of Thy Phoenix | Aug 15 2004, 02:48 AM Post #32 |
![]()
GFX/Web Designer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I never knew about bits, petabytes, exabytes, zettabytes or yottabytes but yeah having a YB of everything would pwn
|
![]() |
|
| Evinta | Aug 15 2004, 02:50 AM Post #33 |
|
^_^
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i think the most you would need for a PC and server is 120gb, if your running somthing like IF you would need WAY more |
![]() |
|
| Flip'd monK | Aug 15 2004, 07:37 AM Post #34 |
|
Scottish Samurai
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have 160 Gb ![]() Great FAQ never knew the last 4 there lol.
|
![]() |
|
| KoolDrew | Aug 15 2004, 10:30 AM Post #35 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A YB of ram would not provide any performance increase at all, but a YB of hard drive space would kick {Curse Word}, but I highly doubt anyone will ever use that much |
![]() |
|
| cookieskater2 | Aug 30 2004, 04:10 PM Post #36 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
yah i got 160 gigs and only used 50 but im gonna get sims 2 and junk and i keep saving all my graphics and i work with video so most of my videos are a gig anyway so i think ic ood use alot lol |
![]() |
|
| .sparX. | Aug 31 2004, 07:32 PM Post #37 |
![]()
·····...یράяא......
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Very nice guide good job man
|
![]() |
|
| AuraStorm | Sep 20 2004, 12:54 PM Post #38 |
|
Lol Wut. That's what he's saying ^
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I want a 9,671,406,556,917,033,397,649,408 YB of Ram
|
![]() |
|
| KoolDrew | Sep 20 2004, 08:58 PM Post #39 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
why. It would not help at all.... It would not be any different from like 2GB of ram unless you run a server....... even 2GB is overkill for most users.. |
![]() |
|
| Burnerp-ZNR | Oct 10 2004, 02:14 AM Post #40 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ha, what do you think computers are all about. OVERKILL But actually 2 Yottha of space would help you alot. First off all if it were to become common around the world, web compressors would be disabled making your load time alot faster. With games, they won't care about a 256RAM peak(that is the standard for now, any game peaking above that is a bad game) But for now the thing that is keeping computers back in speed is the L1 buffer. At the moment most L1 buffers run anywhere between 1300KB p/tck and 3800KB p/tck While the L2 buffers can easlily handle about 512.000KB p/tck. So....... Sincerely, Burner |
![]() |
|
| Websurfer | Jan 25 2005, 08:28 PM Post #41 |
|
Also known as Myr
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You forgot about Nibbles (4 bits/one half of a byte) I swear to God I'm not maknig htat up, I'm studying for the A+ exam and it's in my book ![]() You also forgot a word, which is 16 bits, or two bytes |
![]() |
|
| Scott T | Jan 25 2005, 08:34 PM Post #42 |
|
Joe10 for Admin.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Man, that is one hell of a bump you gave this topic.
I wonder if we'll ever see the day GMail offers that
|
![]() |
|
| Scott | Jan 26 2005, 06:35 PM Post #43 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's basically a pinned topic, so it doesn't really matter if it's bumped. |
![]() |
|
| Eclipseweb_sz | May 24 2005, 11:35 PM Post #44 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Man, I probably need like a 80gb drive. I just installed a DVD writer and it requires 18 GB to write a dual-layer DVD and stuff, and I don't think my 40GB drive can handle it... But would it be nice if we're able to transfer up to 8 Ybps on the Internet?? Or how about storing TRILLIONS of movies on a 1 YB disk? I don't get why people say it's overkill but it might happen... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Technology Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
10:44 AM Jul 11
|




![]](http://b1.ifrm.com/0/1/0/p601690/pipright.png)










10:44 AM Jul 11