We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Poll Only
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
The Da Vinci Code; Holy Blood,Holy Grail
Topic Started: Jun 26 2005, 07:34 PM (741 Views)
doug05257
Member Avatar
The Burger King
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Citizen V
Jun 28 2005, 10:19 AM
Most people grow up with assumptions that Jesus was a man,only devoted to god.If he had a family,if not,or he had a wife.It would shake some people`s belifs,or strengthen them for some.I can imagine that this is true,but people have been taught lies fo so long,they cant.Or wont belive it.Would you throw a entire life`s worth of teachings,belifs and thoughts away for a second`s worth of change?No.

Its either that,or most people are too simple minded to grasp the thought.Truth or not,alot more is real than what you might want to belive.

It amazes me how much you believe in this fiction. Let me ask you, have you ever read the Bible, at all? I mean, it is the basis of the Da Vinci Code. Have you ever looked at the original source, or have you been attempting to uphold a capitalist derivitive of it?

I will assume, for the sake of argument, that you understand that Jesus' teachings obviously prohibited promiscuity and anything other than monogamy. Jesus' teachings also prohibited hypocracy. And, let us assume that Jesus was truly the son of God, and therefore capable of passing on holy blood. We know for a fact that Jesus was never married. And we also know that Jesus was sinless, according to the Bible, but if we're going to assume that Jesus was the Son of God, we might as well assume that too. Therefore, it is obvious that this is all fictional.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Lady Luck
Member Avatar
Texas Ranger
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
doug05257
Jun 28 2005, 04:39 PM
Citizen V
Jun 28 2005, 10:19 AM
Most people grow up with assumptions that Jesus was a man,only devoted to god.If he had a family,if not,or he had a wife.It would shake some people`s belifs,or strengthen them for some.I can imagine that this is true,but people have been taught lies fo so long,they cant.Or wont belive it.Would you throw a entire life`s worth of teachings,belifs and thoughts away for a second`s worth of change?No.

Its either that,or most people are too simple minded to grasp the thought.Truth or not,alot more is real than what you might want to belive.

It amazes me how much you believe in this fiction. Let me ask you, have you ever read the Bible, at all? I mean, it is the basis of the Da Vinci Code. Have you ever looked at the original source, or have you been attempting to uphold a capitalist derivitive of it?

I will assume, for the sake of argument, that you understand that Jesus' teachings obviously prohibited promiscuity and anything other than monogamy. Jesus' teachings also prohibited hypocracy. And, let us assume that Jesus was truly the son of God, and therefore capable of passing on holy blood. We know for a fact that Jesus was never married. And we also know that Jesus was sinless, according to the Bible, but if we're going to assume that Jesus was the Son of God, we might as well assume that too. Therefore, it is obvious that this is all fictional.

Agreed but, when you think about it the bible was written by man so anything could be possible. I don't beleive this cause, they fact of the Son Of God being hypocrital is beyond my thinking. lol :P
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
doug05257
Member Avatar
The Burger King
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Lady Luck
Jun 28 2005, 05:36 PM
Agreed but, when you think about it the bible was written by man so anything could be possible. I don't beleive this cause, they fact of the Son Of God being hypocrital is beyond my thinking. lol :P

Yes. However, if they saw something that was against the teachings, wouldn't they have inquired of it? For example, when Jesus cursed the Fig Tree, his disciples were shocked, and promptly asked about it. Wouldn't you think that they would do the exact same thing if there was something else that they were unsure on? And if they found out anything important, such as this, don't you think they would've reported it?
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Anarchist
Member
[ *  * ]
nobody noticed the code in the cover of the book, which clearly has letters in bold that combine to create a statement from the bible; research that a bit. there are codes in some interesting parts.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
EIIR
Member Avatar
Member
[ * ]
I should start looking into this Da Vinci Code in more detail before I can come to a conclusion :blush:
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
doug05257
Member Avatar
The Burger King
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Anarchist
Jun 29 2005, 07:51 AM
nobody noticed the code in the cover of the book, which clearly has letters in bold that combine to create a statement from the bible; research that a bit. there are codes in some interesting parts.

What does a code on the cover of a fictional book have to do with it's accuracy? :/
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Anarchist
Member
[ *  * ]
i didnt say it made it more true, just said it was interesting
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Glitch
Blasphemer
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I don't think Jesus was holy, so I can't really believe in a holy bloodline.

I think people take Dan Brown too seriously. He's a fiction writer and a cryptology hobbyist, not a historian or a scientist..
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
Alpha
Member Avatar
peace and love.
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Old topic bumped by poll votes.

Topic closed.
Offline Profile Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic »
Poll Only
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2