|
New Game Concole: WiiManx?
|
|
Topic Started: Jul 27 2008, 08:52 PM (1,071 Views)
|
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 27 2008, 08:52 PM
Post #1
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
There have been many rumors of the new gaming console supposedly made by nintendo called, the WiiManx. There aren't any availible pictures that I can provide but, have any of you ever heard of it?
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Charron
|
Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Post #2
|
- Posts:
- 1,688
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #70,965
- Joined:
- September 20, 2005
- I'm Browsing With
- Chrome
|
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
|
|
|
| |
|
IceMetalPunk
|
Jul 28 2008, 02:49 AM
Post #3
|
We are all IMPerfect. Be proud!
- Posts:
- 3,866
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #60,161
- Joined:
- July 6, 2005
|
No. WiiManx is some serious misunderstanding of the Wimax technology: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX
-IMP
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 28 2008, 01:59 PM
Post #4
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
Sorry, but I don't need a regular IF member to tell me how and when to post. Leave that up to a Global Moderator, Support Team Member, or Administrator to do that please. Trying to moderate someone else only leads to more trouble. Furthermore, don't take on someone elses job. Moderate your own forums.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Jul 28 2008, 03:29 PM
Post #5
|
Twilight is upon me, and soon night must fall.
- Posts:
- 17,867
- Group:
- Community Admin
- Member
- #1,011
- Joined:
- April 3, 2003
- I'm Browsing With
- Firefox
- My Board URL
- http://forums.yodaminch.com
- Latest Blog Entry
- Twilight is upon me, and soon night must fall.
|
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 01:59 PM
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
Sorry, but I don't need a regular IF member to tell me how and when to post. Leave that up to a Global Moderator, Support Team Member, or Administrator to do that please. Trying to moderate someone else only leads to more trouble. Furthermore, don't take on someone elses job. Moderate your own forums. If you were asking for support, he'd be in the wrong. You asked a question about a console and he didn't understand it and requested clarification. Something he's perfectly within his right to do.
In the future, don't attack a member when they were (very politely) asking for you to elaborate what you meant. :-/
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 28 2008, 06:15 PM
Post #6
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
- Stephen
- Jul 28 2008, 03:29 PM
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 01:59 PM
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
Sorry, but I don't need a regular IF member to tell me how and when to post. Leave that up to a Global Moderator, Support Team Member, or Administrator to do that please. Trying to moderate someone else only leads to more trouble. Furthermore, don't take on someone elses job. Moderate your own forums.
If you were asking for support, he'd be in the wrong. You asked a question about a console and he didn't understand it and requested clarification. Something he's perfectly within his right to do. In the future, don't attack a member when they were (very politely) asking for you to elaborate what you meant. :-/ I'm not attacking anyone. All I politly said was that I don't need another member to moderate me on how and when to post. Which I don't. He is in the wrong. I have a right to tell him to not moderate and leave it to a Support Team , Global Moderator, or Administrator to do that. I didn't attack him nor did I spam him. I politly told him not to tutor me.
|
|
|
| |
|
IceMetalPunk
|
Jul 28 2008, 07:41 PM
Post #7
|
We are all IMPerfect. Be proud!
- Posts:
- 3,866
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #60,161
- Joined:
- July 6, 2005
|
Not that this will help any, but he did not "moderate" you. There was nothing like moderation in his post, he was simply asking you to elaborate a bit on your question.
And did you read the rest of his post beyond the first paragraph? He did try to help such as he could.
-IMP
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 28 2008, 07:51 PM
Post #8
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
- IceMetalPunk
- Jul 28 2008, 07:41 PM
Not that thin will help any, but he did not "moderate" you. There was nothing like moderation in his post, he was simply asking you to elaborate a bit on your question. And did you read the rest of his post beyond the first paragraph? He did try to help such as he could. -IMP Yes I read it
|
|
|
| |
|
IceMetalPunk
|
Jul 28 2008, 09:10 PM
Post #9
|
We are all IMPerfect. Be proud!
- Posts:
- 3,866
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #60,161
- Joined:
- July 6, 2005
|
Oh, I just found this: http://www.wimanx.com/
That may be another source of confusion.
-IMP
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 28 2008, 09:26 PM
Post #10
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
Oh, wow, I guess that was a silly rumor now wasn't it.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Charron
|
Jul 28 2008, 11:41 PM
Post #11
|
- Posts:
- 1,688
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #70,965
- Joined:
- September 20, 2005
- I'm Browsing With
- Chrome
|
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 06:15 PM
- Stephen
- Jul 28 2008, 03:29 PM
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 01:59 PM
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
Sorry, but I don't need a regular IF member to tell me how and when to post. Leave that up to a Global Moderator, Support Team Member, or Administrator to do that please. Trying to moderate someone else only leads to more trouble. Furthermore, don't take on someone elses job. Moderate your own forums.
If you were asking for support, he'd be in the wrong. You asked a question about a console and he didn't understand it and requested clarification. Something he's perfectly within his right to do. In the future, don't attack a member when they were (very politely) asking for you to elaborate what you meant. :-/
I'm not attacking anyone. All I politly said was that I don't need another member to moderate me on how and when to post. Which I don't. He is in the wrong. I have a right to tell him to not moderate and leave it to a Support Team , Global Moderator, or Administrator to do that. I didn't attack him nor did I spam him. I politly told him not to tutor me.  In no way did I try to moderate you at all. I had never heard of this Wii ManX and I asked you to post more descriptively, more so where you heard this from, so I could try to find information on it. If I was moderating I would say something along the lines of "Please be more descriptive" and that would be all. I posted as much of my instight from the slight information given from the original post (Which was only a name, as that is why I asked for more information).
And second of all, how can you say I am in the wrong when a member of staff has said I have done no wrong?
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 29 2008, 01:47 AM
Post #12
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 11:41 PM
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 06:15 PM
- Stephen
- Jul 28 2008, 03:29 PM
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 28 2008, 01:59 PM
- Robert Charron
- Jul 28 2008, 01:18 AM
Could you please be a little more discriptive with your posts here? A three word post doesn't really help us at all if were trying to look into a potential system. (Example: Where you heard it from, what it's features are, is it a complete new system, or just an upgrade from Wii original, etc.) I'm just trying to look into this and I can't find anything on it - the closest thing I have found is a post regrading a network connection.
Either way, Nintendo and other companies tend to make project names (Like Nintendo Revoultion, which I still think sounds cooler than Nintendo Wii), and to call it directly upon first news Wii ManX, seems more like a fake to me. Wii ManX to me sounds like a possible addition to the Wii (Like the controllers they have for shooter games, sports games, etc.) or else a new game. Nintendo doesn't tend to stick to similar names to (Think about it - PS1, PS2, PS3 as opposed to N64, Wii, Gamecube - no similarities). And I think that's mostly due to the fact Nintendo goes more for originality and fun over performance (Better graphics, same games like Xbox and Sony).
Anyways, just my thoughts. Seems like a hoax to me, based on just the name given. If any resources or anything on it were possible it might change my mind, but I don' know.
Sorry, but I don't need a regular IF member to tell me how and when to post. Leave that up to a Global Moderator, Support Team Member, or Administrator to do that please. Trying to moderate someone else only leads to more trouble. Furthermore, don't take on someone elses job. Moderate your own forums.
If you were asking for support, he'd be in the wrong. You asked a question about a console and he didn't understand it and requested clarification. Something he's perfectly within his right to do. In the future, don't attack a member when they were (very politely) asking for you to elaborate what you meant. :-/
I'm not attacking anyone. All I politly said was that I don't need another member to moderate me on how and when to post. Which I don't. He is in the wrong. I have a right to tell him to not moderate and leave it to a Support Team , Global Moderator, or Administrator to do that. I didn't attack him nor did I spam him. I politly told him not to tutor me. 
In no way did I try to moderate you at all. I had never heard of this Wii ManX and I asked you to post more descriptively, more so where you heard this from, so I could try to find information on it. If I was moderating I would say something along the lines of "Please be more descriptive" and that would be all. I posted as much of my instight from the slight information given from the original post (Which was only a name, as that is why I asked for more information). And second of all, how can you say I am in the wrong when a member of staff has said I have done no wrong? Well its not that but, do you see how everyone tries to jump in and put there input on a certain topic? Thats what I don't like. Why do you have to do that anyways? Leave that up to a moderator please.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Charron
|
Jul 29 2008, 03:10 PM
Post #13
|
- Posts:
- 1,688
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #70,965
- Joined:
- September 20, 2005
- I'm Browsing With
- Chrome
|
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 29 2008, 01:47 AM
Well its not that but, do you see how everyone tries to jump in and put there input on a certain topic? Thats what I don't like. Why do you have to do that anyways? Leave that up to a moderator please. See the reason to start topics is to get people of the communities input, so if you don't want that then why should you start a topic? If I was honestly trying to "moderate" I would have replyed to your 40 other posts that are 6 words long and offer nothing to the original post. I simply requested more information so I could answer more in depth, knowing more of what your talking about rather than making assumptions based off of just a name. I am within full rights to ask of that. You don't have to answer, but don't assualt me and make accusations that are completely off.
|
|
|
| |
|
Comic_Mischief
|
Jul 29 2008, 11:51 PM
Post #14
|
- Posts:
- 79
- Group:
- Banned
- Member
- #171,720
- Joined:
- July 13, 2008
|
- Robert Charron
- Jul 29 2008, 03:10 PM
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 29 2008, 01:47 AM
Well its not that but, do you see how everyone tries to jump in and put there input on a certain topic? Thats what I don't like. Why do you have to do that anyways? Leave that up to a moderator please.
See the reason to start topics is to get people of the communities input, so if you don't want that then why should you start a topic? If I was honestly trying to "moderate" I would have replyed to your 40 other posts that are 6 words long and offer nothing to the original post. I simply requested more information so I could answer more in depth, knowing more of what your talking about rather than making assumptions based off of just a name. I am within full rights to ask of that. You don't have to answer, but don't assualt me and make accusations that are completely off. I know that you start a thread to get replies......what I'm saying is, you didn't have to say what you said. I asked a question about the rumored console WiiManx, I didn't ask you you to tell me about how discriptive my thread was. First off, I didn't assualt you nor did I make false accusations. All I said was, I don't you need you to tell me me how and when to post. Now you can take that anyway you want and somehow you may get offended but, thats I all I said.
|
|
|
| |
|
Robert Charron
|
Jul 30 2008, 07:58 PM
Post #15
|
- Posts:
- 1,688
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #70,965
- Joined:
- September 20, 2005
- I'm Browsing With
- Chrome
|
- Comic_Mischief
- Jul 29 2008, 11:51 PM
I know that you start a thread to get replies......what I'm saying is, you didn't have to say what you said. I asked a question about the rumored console WiiManx, I didn't ask you you to tell me about how discriptive my thread was.  First off, I didn't assualt you nor did I make false accusations. All I said was, I don't you need you to tell me me how and when to post. Now you can take that anyway you want and somehow you may get offended but, thats I all I said.  How you interpret what I say is not my fault, but yours, but to actually come up and accuse me (and yes, you did accuse me) of something, and tell me that I am in the wrong, just makes you wrong. Espically when a member of staff has already posted a reply to this thread. If I was backseat moderating, I would have recieved a warning from a member of staff, would I have not? I did not tell you how to post, I merely requested more information from a specific post, so that I may look more into whatever it is the original post is. Something I am within full rights to do. And furthermore, this is the third time on record that I have seen from your posts, that you blaitently said that the staff were wrong. Somehow I don't think staff can be wrong about their own rules.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|