| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| my 3rd attempt at making an innocent thread; . | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 21 2005, 04:18 PM (1,431 Views) | |
| Vettore | Nov 22 2005, 03:39 AM Post #46 |
![]()
DON VETTORE
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Congratulations. |
![]() |
|
| punk-emo-rocker | Nov 22 2005, 03:50 AM Post #47 |
|
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
saying that didn't help the situation Lock this. n.ick, in the end, it's against the rules. So stop complaning that the staff didn't see other threads. It's against the rules and the staff letting this happen just shows that they can be beat. So SZ staff, stop giving in, it's making you all look bad. I ment no offense in this post. |
![]() |
|
| DaNtE X | Nov 22 2005, 07:36 AM Post #48 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But in this post, he didnt do anything wrong...so its legal. |
![]() |
|
| jelly belly | Nov 22 2005, 11:37 AM Post #49 |
![]()
The SZ asshole
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
</backseatmoderation> the thing is that this isn't against the rules, i have a right to make a post landmark thread with shout outs that dosnt get locked. read the general chat TOS. |
![]() |
|
| convergent | Nov 22 2005, 02:27 PM Post #50 |
![]()
Disabled User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But your last "shout-out" had no true shout-outs, making it against the rules. Common sense. @Remzo: Yea, that's why I edited my post. I thought that was unnecesary too. |
![]() |
|
| Ross | Nov 22 2005, 02:35 PM Post #51 |
|
Inspire
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
For clarification purposes this topic is fine. Unlike the other two it is done properly with personal shout outs. Please keep all further discussion in this thread concerning the reason this topic was started. |
![]() |
|
| Sean. | Nov 22 2005, 02:40 PM Post #52 |
|
International pimp of mystery
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Personally I dont see the point of any "shout out" topics. But congratulations anyway
|
![]() |
|
| Tai | Nov 22 2005, 03:46 PM Post #53 |
![]()
Better Than You.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
boring? on that subject, what's with all the sig's like: [ Juano For Juano ] i mean, as if that's ever gonna happen. and if it did, well, what a shame. point made |
![]() |
|
| jelly belly | Nov 22 2005, 04:23 PM Post #54 |
![]()
The SZ asshole
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
why would that never happen? |
![]() |
|
| Sytex | Nov 22 2005, 05:00 PM Post #55 |
|
AEKDB
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's a shame that you condemn a promotion with such rudeness. It is not for you to decide the shame of, brought upon, or instituted as far as any of the promotions pertaining to the IFSZ are concerned. As far as this debate is concerned, it is relevant for only one with authority to make judgement as to whether a topic should be left open for discussion or closed in general. In some cases, such "shout out" posts can be deemed as legitimate posts according to the nature, content, and structure contained within. For example, a shout out post of the following:
That would most likely be deemed as spam; therefore being closed. One more of,
That is a reasonable post of mature discussion. However, the final say, lies with those that have been embodied to make important board decisions that are not limited to the rights to close certain topics if deemed irrelevant. |
![]() |
|
| StingerSplash85 | Nov 22 2005, 08:18 PM Post #56 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Fine. When I wanna make a landmark topic, you guys have to keep it unlocked, or it wouldn't be fair, and like P-E-R said, it makes you look bad. |
![]() |
|
| convergent | Nov 22 2005, 08:20 PM Post #57 |
![]()
Disabled User
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As long as it has reasonable shout-outs, there's no point to close it.
|
![]() |
|
| Ross | Nov 22 2005, 08:23 PM Post #58 |
|
Inspire
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why would I lock yours? You guys are taking this WAY to seriously. There shouldn't be much debate over it anyways. If you have a landmark post topic with sensible shout outs, post it here. If not...post it in the Forum Game topic. If people keep making it to complex we might have to rethink allowing them altogether. So seriously, just go by the rule established or don't worry about it. And this also isn't much of a thread to discuss it. If you have any complaints or ideas concerning it...PM me. |
![]() |
|
| Juano | Nov 22 2005, 08:25 PM Post #59 |
|
Juano
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hey man. What's the problem? I don't force anyone to promote me in their signature. Sorry for this being so off-topic. Might as well: Congrats again Nick, lol. |
![]() |
|
| Scott T | Nov 22 2005, 09:24 PM Post #60 |
|
Joe10 for Admin.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is it worth having an ego if you can't pull it off right? Rowain for Rowain...Damn straight. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
10:13 AM Jul 11
|




![]](http://b1.ifrm.com/0/1/0/p601690/pipright.png)







10:13 AM Jul 11