We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Did Man and Dinosaurs coexist?
Topic Started: Dec 18 2005, 08:26 PM (1,184 Views)
henniej
Member Avatar
Member
[ * ]
Man and dinosaurs did not coexist. There is proof that the dinosaurs died out LONG before man arrived on the scene.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tic-tac
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
yeah, there is proof of it
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Sw33t_DreamZ
Member Avatar
Busy Momma
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
personally I believe that man and dinosaur co-exhisted at some point. just because proof of man exhisting along with dinosaurs was never found doesnt mean it's not true. I go with the belief if we are not supposed to find something then we wont find it (for whatever reason).

Example would be Noah's ark their was evidence of a flood right at that time frame but they never found the ark would that say it wasnt ment to be found? And if we cant find something that big or at least evidence of it then heh we couldnt find evidence of human exhistance either.

(go ahead say I'm off my rocker I'll just laugh and let you think whatever you want)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tic-tac
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
maybe you are right I'm not strongly set one way or another. The problem with things that we might not be suposted to find out is that human curiosity makes some of us try. That is why we ponder shuch things
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Glitch
Blasphemer
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
If you don't clean your room in a year, the stuff from the beginning of the year will be near the bottom, and the stuff from near the end would be at the top.
Dinosaur fossils are below mammal and homonid fossils in the ground. No dinosaur fossils are found at the same level as homonid fossils, and no homonid fossils are found at the same level as dinosaur fossils.

I think that's telling us something, but that's just my opinion ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Corey89
Member Avatar
:::::::::::::::::::::::::
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Isn't it impossible for animals to grow to the size of dinosaurs because of the amount of oxygen, or something like that?

Millions of years ago the oxygen density was much higher then it is today allowing dinosaurs to grow to be huge in our standards. You could always say they just became smaller which is what I think birds are. Then again that would be evolution.

I’m not sure if that’s correct, it might not have been oxygen, but I don’t know, whatever.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
W Axl Rose
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  * ]
Hells no.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dyssomnia
Member
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Your friend needs to take a freshman physical science class. Carbon-14 has too short a half-life to date fossils, and basic geology decrees that the farther you dig, the further you go back in time.

As for the Noah's Ark thing, it's also reasoned that the 'great flood' was one of many floods that occured arount that time, including, I believe, one that made the Dead Sea turn into a sea.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
.Seraph
Member Avatar
Member
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Having to do with Noah's ark, the place where it's located at (or so says believers), is constantly forming new ice, and pushing rock, ice, and anything else up there down. If the ark was up there it would have been shoved off. Not to mention wood rots after 2 or 3 thousand years, and Noah's ark was supposedly up there since about 5-7 thousand years ago. So really, if there was an ark, it's not there anymore. Plus, there would be a global flood layer if there was a global flood... which there isn't... Noah's ark is fake, end of story.

As per this debate, Glitch and company are handling the rest fine. Carry on!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
super serb
Member
[ *  * ]
we really have no proof that dinosaurs existed.....except for some skeletons
so i guess u can say yes
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Curry
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Saiyan
Dec 24 2005, 02:17 PM
Having to do with Noah's ark, the place where it's located at (or so says believers), is constantly forming new ice, and pushing rock, ice, and anything else up there down. If the ark was up there it would have been shoved off. Not to mention wood rots after 2 or 3 thousand years, and Noah's ark was supposedly up there since about 5-7 thousand years ago. So really, if there was an ark, it's not there anymore. Plus, there would be a global flood layer if there was a global flood... which there isn't... Noah's ark is fake, end of story.

As per this debate, Glitch and company are handling the rest fine. Carry on!

Dude, read:

http://www.layevangelism.com/advtxbk/secti...-10/sec10-5.htm
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2