We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 11
Can God create a rock bigger than He can lift?
Topic Started: Jan 23 2006, 11:07 PM (2,035 Views)
Remzo
Member Avatar
<3
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Fleetcom
Jan 30 2006, 08:33 PM
Green Day Fan
Jan 30 2006, 03:11 AM
I don't believe in God, so I'm going to hell, right?

Cept I don't believe in hell, but I guess I'll find out.

So what do you believe in? That when you die you just lie there in the ground for all eternity?

Your mind is gone, your brain has a shut down.

Think of a computer, when you shut it off what happens? Humans are the exact same, but to never ever turn on again.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ExiledSoldier
Member Avatar
To Holmgard and Beyond
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Ross
Jan 23 2006, 08:32 PM
Glitch
Jan 23 2006, 10:15 PM
God cannot sin because if, for example, God commits murder, the murder would not become a sin anymore, and would become godly. And any being as powerful as God can easily destroy themselves.

And if the answer to that question is no, then he cannot create the rock therefore he is not omnipotent.

The Christian God cannot destroy himself.

Quote:
 

Revelation 1:8
 

"I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty."

Hebrews 13:8
 

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

Genesis 21:33
 

Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba, and there he called upon the name of the LORD, the Eternal God.

Isaiah 26:4
 
Trust in the LORD forever, for the LORD, the LORD, is the Rock eternal.

119:89
 
Your word, O LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.

Daniel 4:34
 
At the end of that time, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyes toward heaven, and my sanity was restored. Then I praised the Most High; I honored and glorified him who lives forever. His dominion is an eternal dominion; his kingdom endures from generation to generation.

Romans 16:26
 
But now revealed and made known through the prophetic writings by the command of the eternal God, so that all nations might believe and obey him—

2 Corinthians 4:18
 
So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.

1 Timothy 1:17
 
Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Hebrews 9:14
 
How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God

If you don't think that proves his eternal and everlasting nature, I am not quite sure what to say. It is scripturally supported that the Christian God will forever reign, thus he could and would not ever cease to exsist.

YES he can defy himself!

Here is a list of Bible Contradictions:

Quote:
 

Quote:
 

Q: is God peaceable?
A: Rom. 15:33. The God of peace. (Isaiah 2:4)
Ex. 15:3. The Lord is a man of war. (Joel 3:9-10)


Quote:
 

Q: Shall we Obey the law?
A: I Peter 2:13. Sumbit yourself to every ordinance of man.
Acts 5:29. We ought to obey God rather than men.




Those are only 2! if you want more i have plenty
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Curry
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
ExiledSoldier
Jan 31 2006, 12:44 AM
Ross
Jan 23 2006, 08:32 PM
Glitch
Jan 23 2006, 10:15 PM
God cannot sin because if, for example, God commits murder, the murder would not become a sin anymore, and would become godly. And any being as powerful as God can easily destroy themselves.

And if the answer to that question is no, then he cannot create the rock therefore he is not omnipotent.

The Christian God cannot destroy himself.

Quote:
 

Revelation 1:8
 

"I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty."

Hebrews 13:8
 

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.

Genesis 21:33
 

Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba, and there he called upon the name of the LORD, the Eternal God.

Isaiah 26:4
 
Trust in the LORD forever, for the LORD, the LORD, is the Rock eternal.

119:89
 
Your word, O LORD, is eternal; it stands firm in the heavens.

Daniel 4:34
 
At the end of that time, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyes toward heaven, and my sanity was restored. Then I praised the Most High; I honored and glorified him who lives forever. His dominion is an eternal dominion; his kingdom endures from generation to generation.

Romans 16:26
 
But now revealed and made known through the prophetic writings by the command of the eternal God, so that all nations might believe and obey him—

2 Corinthians 4:18
 
So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.

1 Timothy 1:17
 
Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Hebrews 9:14
 
How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God

If you don't think that proves his eternal and everlasting nature, I am not quite sure what to say. It is scripturally supported that the Christian God will forever reign, thus he could and would not ever cease to exsist.

YES he can defy himself!

Here is a list of Bible Contradictions:

Quote:
 

Quote:
 

Q: is God peaceable?
A: Rom. 15:33. The God of peace. (Isaiah 2:4)
Ex. 15:3. The Lord is a man of war. (Joel 3:9-10)


Quote:
 

Q: Shall we Obey the law?
A: I Peter 2:13. Sumbit yourself to every ordinance of man.
Acts 5:29. We ought to obey God rather than men.




Those are only 2! if you want more i have plenty

From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shroud
Member Avatar
Know Your Enemy
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 11:36 AM
From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!

You know full well it doesn't contradict itself.

Humans probably crossed through the land bridge to alaska.

Leif Ericson was the first known person to arrive in America.

Christopher was the first known European to arrive in America.

Not to mention History books can't prove it's points, only uses the ones with most evidence.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Curry
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 11:32 AM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 11:36 AM
From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!

You know full well it doesn't contradict itself.

Humans probably crossed through the land bridge to alaska.

Leif Ericson was the first known person to arrive in America.

Christopher was the first known European to arrive in America.

Not to mention History books can't prove it's points, only uses the ones with most evidence.

Leif Ericson was a European, so Christopher Columbus wasn't the first European. So there's a contradiction.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shroud
Member Avatar
Know Your Enemy
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 08:49 PM
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 11:32 AM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 11:36 AM
From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!

You know full well it doesn't contradict itself.

Humans probably crossed through the land bridge to alaska.

Leif Ericson was the first known person to arrive in America.

Christopher was the first known European to arrive in America.

Not to mention History books can't prove it's points, only uses the ones with most evidence.

Leif Ericson was a European, so Christopher Columbus wasn't the first European. So there's a contradiction.

Same history book?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Curry
Member Avatar

[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 05:05 PM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 08:49 PM
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 11:32 AM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 11:36 AM
From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!

You know full well it doesn't contradict itself.

Humans probably crossed through the land bridge to alaska.

Leif Ericson was the first known person to arrive in America.

Christopher was the first known European to arrive in America.

Not to mention History books can't prove it's points, only uses the ones with most evidence.

Leif Ericson was a European, so Christopher Columbus wasn't the first European. So there's a contradiction.

Same history book?

Those three quotes were in my history book. I was simply saying that they were contradicting another.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Shroud
Member Avatar
Know Your Enemy
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 10:27 PM
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 05:05 PM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 08:49 PM
Shroud
Jan 31 2006, 11:32 AM
Vulcan
Jan 31 2006, 11:36 AM
From my history book:

"Humans have crossed through the land bridge in Alaska to get to North America."
"Leif Ericson was the first person to arrive in America."
"Christopher Columbus was the first European to arrive in America."


The history book has made a contradiction!

You know full well it doesn't contradict itself.

Humans probably crossed through the land bridge to alaska.

Leif Ericson was the first known person to arrive in America.

Christopher was the first known European to arrive in America.

Not to mention History books can't prove it's points, only uses the ones with most evidence.

Leif Ericson was a European, so Christopher Columbus wasn't the first European. So there's a contradiction.

Same history book?

Those three quotes were in my history book. I was simply saying that they were contradicting another.

Then whoever wrote your history book weren't very good at all.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 11