| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| theSUNisSETTING | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 15 2006, 12:59 AM (209 Views) | |
| lightsilver | Mar 15 2006, 12:59 AM Post #1 |
![]()
this || that
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Jakes | Mar 15 2006, 01:00 AM Post #2 |
|
wowowewah
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
its pretty simple but the effects of the sky and the dimness of the sun is ownage. good job light man. |
![]() |
|
| lightsilver | Mar 15 2006, 01:18 AM Post #3 |
![]()
this || that
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks .My vectors will remain simple untill I gain more experiance in them. |
![]() |
|
| Juano | Mar 15 2006, 01:58 AM Post #4 |
|
Juano
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The slightly offset mountains are nice, good job =O |
![]() |
|
| Shad0wSt0rm | Mar 15 2006, 06:29 PM Post #5 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"Vector"??? No offense to you, but I'm really getting tired of people calling work like this "vectors". The only0 shape here that could be mistaken for a vector would be the "trees", but it is most likely not a vector either. The sun and sky are definitely NOT vectors. Vectors don't have shading, blurring, or gradients. That's the point. Vector art consists of creating paths and points to create a shape. Images created in raster-based programs (like Photoshop) should not be mistaken for vectors. Neither should images that have been filtered to resemble vector-based art (ie. Cutout Filter), just for future reference. The program used (Illustrator, FreeHand, etc.) keeps track of the relationships between these points and paths. Every time the image is scaled, the paths are regenerated: this creates images that are infinitely scalable without degradation. See, you've learned something new today. ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Drew | Mar 15 2006, 06:36 PM Post #6 |
|
&TIME.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Kinda plain. x_x But other than that fact, it is good.
|
![]() |
|
| Gangstarr71 | Mar 15 2006, 06:37 PM Post #7 |
|
Movin On Up.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not bad, though the sun looks a bit beveled :|. (I gotta agree with the guy above me though xD) Ideal would kill if he saw your topic title xDDDDDDDDDDD |
![]() |
|
| Kookin Keith | Mar 15 2006, 10:35 PM Post #8 |
|
Don't ever start looking behind
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Interesting, kind of looks cartoon like. Keep at it |
![]() |
|
| lightsilver | Mar 15 2006, 11:43 PM Post #9 |
![]()
this || that
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh. I am sorry... I thought a vector was just when you used paths (i.e pen tool.) Didn't realise it couldn't have grandants or layer styles. :'( Forgive me. |
![]() |
|
| Dynamik. (PM) | Mar 16 2006, 10:04 AM Post #10 |
|
holy shit look who it is
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice job, I like the text almost as much as the art
|
![]() |
|
| Shad0wSt0rm | Mar 16 2006, 06:49 PM Post #11 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Forgiven So you did use the pen tool? I assume you didn't pen tool the entire sun... :S Well, it would be possible with four points and a curved path... hmm. Anyways, hope I didn't sound like a jerk in my above post. Just that I'm starting to see a lot of people nowadays, who don't know what vectors really are. When you do use the Pen Tool in photoshop, you should "Create a Custom Shape" with it, and never rasterize the shape layer. That way you can enlarge it infinitely at any time. Then it would be a legit vector, I suppose.
|
![]() |
|
| lightsilver | Mar 16 2006, 08:04 PM Post #12 |
![]()
this || that
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't resaturize anything. I could make it bigger any amount right now, the only differance would be I would have to adjust the brevel... |
![]() |
|
| Ideal | Mar 17 2006, 09:40 AM Post #13 |
|
hey there delilah
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
very plain and typo is bad, work on it |
![]() |
|
| Shad0wSt0rm | Mar 17 2006, 06:32 PM Post #14 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
quote quote quote quote ![]() Any Layer effects that you added would have to be refigured. The Bevel and Gradients would all be different when applied to a larger scaled shape. Oh well, keep working on it.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Community Showcase · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:04 PM Jul 11
|




![]](http://b1.ifrm.com/0/1/0/p601690/pipright.png)



.
3:04 PM Jul 11