| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| CSS Style (ZB); Vote! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 16 2007, 05:23 AM (1,145 Views) | |
| Nicola | Jun 16 2007, 05:23 AM Post #1 |
|
Zatharawrus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'd *assume* that most skinners here have already taken a peek at the very least (or even attempted to edit it) of Zetaboards' CSS. With IF about 99% of you are used to it appearing in this format: Style A
The other 1% might find that so annoying they edit it themselves to look like this: Style B
Then of course the Zetaboards CSS is split up. The top half deals with the style only. The second half contains the structure (padding/margins/widths etc) which I know a few of you do bother editing. Style C
Therefore question is...which does everyone prefer? What do feel comfortable using? Note that this isn't a poll I'm doing on behalf of ZB. The CSS for ZB will be staying like it is. What *I* need to know is which CSS styles to post :angel: I may have skinned ZB but I didn't realise until editing a test board for myself how long it takes...and when you think "grr my padding isn't working...OHHH its somewhere near the end of the style sheet *searches*...*searches* Ah finally there it is! :D"Disclaimer: The ZB css is sexy and yummy...I mean no harm towards it
|
![]() |
|
| Aetheria | Jun 16 2007, 05:32 AM Post #2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A. It's always just seemed more logical to me. Everything's there, and easy to spot. B has the same principle, but i feel it's just wasting space.
|
![]() |
|
| Pheonix | Jun 16 2007, 05:51 AM Post #3 |
![]()
color my world.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Style C, much better, since I can find stuff easily on that because of the space amount. The thing I really like is how it's formed. They're grouped, which is gewd. so... yeah ftw. <3 but I couldn't really judge because I don't skin |
![]() |
|
| Tim | Jun 16 2007, 06:00 AM Post #4 |
|
TimS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Either B or C. C is nice and structured and I guess makes skinning for new skinners easier. But I guess you could argue with style C, people are more likely to edit your skins as it would be easier. When creating a skin, I prefer to use B or C, but for skins being posted, its just as easy to use Style A, as it rarely needs to be readable. |
![]() |
|
| Leonardo | Jun 16 2007, 07:37 AM Post #5 |
|
Hakuna Matata
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I prefer A, it seems much cleaner and easier to spot things. |
![]() |
|
| OverTheBelow | Jun 16 2007, 07:46 AM Post #6 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A is the best IMO. |
![]() |
|
| Pedro | Jun 16 2007, 07:55 AM Post #7 |
|
zugzwang
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I prefer the A too for the same reasons as Leonardo and also because I guess I'm more used to see it around.
|
![]() |
|
| Nephos | Jun 16 2007, 07:56 AM Post #8 |
|
The walls abandon shape
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
B, but I tend to do it something like this:
Where [tab] = 4 spaces. So structure on top and styling beneath, but within the same brackets. It would probably be more logical to put structure underneath though. |
![]() |
|
| Sith | Jun 16 2007, 08:11 AM Post #9 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I use B nowadays. I never knew ZB used min-width and max-width, I've used min-width on my latest skin. |
![]() |
|
| Skyvale | Jun 16 2007, 08:36 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Thanks for the avatar, TTO!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm most comfortable with using option A. It's what I'm used to from IF. More compact and easy to find things.
|
![]() |
|
| Peter | Jun 16 2007, 09:54 AM Post #11 |
|
Care for a quiche?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm with Nephos on this one. I find it much easier to locate specific things if it's structured well and clearly organised. C is great in principle, but in reality it means you have a lot of code to sift through which wastes time and space. |
![]() |
|
| Colin. | Jun 16 2007, 09:57 AM Post #12 |
|
she was this androgynist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
B, most definitely. C is good in theory, but could be a bit annoying when adding new coding in or something, where you'd have to decide what goes where. But B is comfortable, doesn't waste space and is very well organized. |
![]() |
|
| .Wizard (PM) | Jun 16 2007, 10:13 AM Post #13 |
![]()
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Style A. Easiest to work with.
|
![]() |
|
| amhc | Jun 16 2007, 11:15 AM Post #14 |
![]()
resident jesus
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I prefer either A or B, though I usually use B.
|
![]() |
|
| Seraphim. | Jun 16 2007, 11:20 AM Post #15 |
|
Possible Bot
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A or B. I've always used style A and B isn't really anything different. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Creative Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
4:20 AM Jul 11
|



![]](http://b1.ifrm.com/0/1/0/p601690/pipright.png)
*searches*...*searches* Ah finally there it is! :D"







4:20 AM Jul 11