|
Replies:
|
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 10:02 AM
Post #16
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 01:46 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 03:21 AM
- lightsilver
- Jun 29 2007, 02:13 AM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 28 2007, 05:22 PM
- Steve
- Jun 28 2007, 05:17 PM
I think the shading is still too extreme, and the eyes and lips are not great either. But keep working on it.
Are you familiar with what a vector is?
just an image made with paths, how it looks has nothing to do with if it's a vector =/
Actually, you couldn't be farther from the truth. When talking about renders, not signatures, by definition a vector is "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. " So actually, what you just said couldn't be farther from the opposite of what a vector actually is. If you still think you are correct, you can go over to Gimp Talk and tell the 9,025 members over there that they are all wrong. Otherwise, now you know.
You couldn't be farther from the truth. A vector is a geometrical formula. Certain programs can turn these formulas to represent images. Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Unlike steve, you mus not know anything about vectors. What you just stated is the mathematical formula for a vector, not the artistic formula for a vector. What that other member stated before was the definition of a signature vector, and what I am talking about is the definition of a render vector. What you stated can be applied to art, but you only expanded upon my first statement when I said a vector is a re-coloration process, you just put it in fancied terms, your statement doesn't contradict my knowledge at all. You expressed what a vector is in mathematical terms, while I expressed it in artistic.
Here is ( in extreme length) what you said:
A vector, as defined above by you, is a specific mathematical structure. It has numerous physical and geometric applications, which result mainly from its ability to represent magnitude and direction simultaneously. Wind, for example, had both a speed and a direction and, hence, is conveniently expressed as a vector. The same can be said of moving objects and forces. The location of a points on a cartesian coordinate plane is usually expressed as an ordered pair (x, y), which is a specific example of a vector. Being a vector, (x, y) has a a certain distance (magnitude) from and angle (direction) relative to the origin (0, 0). Vectors are quite useful in simplifying problems from three-dimensional geometry.
In other words, it can be "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid (simplified) colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. "
Don't try to shut someone down unless you absolutely know what you are talking about.
- Quote:
-
Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Given the fact that this is my first one, I wouldn't be surprised.
|
|
|
| |
|
Tsunamiflare
|
Jun 29 2007, 10:47 AM
Post #17
|
- Posts:
- 23
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #281,371
- Joined:
- June 25, 2007
|
For gimp it looks really good.
|
|
|
| |
|
Curry
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:56 AM
Post #18
|
- Posts:
- 13,232
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #4,585
- Joined:
- December 27, 2003
- I'm Browsing With
- Safari
|
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 10:02 AM
Unlike steve, you mus not know anything about vectors. What you just stated is the mathematical formula for a vector, not the artistic formula for a vector. What that other member stated before was the definition of a signature vector, and what I am talking about is the definition of a render vector. What you stated can be applied to art, but you only expanded upon my first statement when I said a vector is a re-coloration process, you just put it in fancied terms, your statement doesn't contradict my knowledge at all. You expressed what a vector is in mathematical terms, while I expressed it in artistic. Here is ( in extreme length) what you said: A vector, as defined above by you, is a specific mathematical structure. It has numerous physical and geometric applications, which result mainly from its ability to represent magnitude and direction simultaneously. Wind, for example, had both a speed and a direction and, hence, is conveniently expressed as a vector. The same can be said of moving objects and forces. The location of a points on a cartesian coordinate plane is usually expressed as an ordered pair (x, y), which is a specific example of a vector. Being a vector, (x, y) has a a certain distance (magnitude) from and angle (direction) relative to the origin (0, 0). Vectors are quite useful in simplifying problems from three-dimensional geometry. In other words, it can be "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid (simplified) colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. " Don't try to shut someone down unless you absolutely know what you are talking about. - Quote:
-
Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Given the fact that this is my first one, I wouldn't be surprised.
Oh dear lord, you make me laugh. XD The mathematical vector is what the pen tool creates. It just fills it with a certain color.
|
|
|
| |
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 11:58 AM
Post #19
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 03:56 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 10:02 AM
Unlike steve, you mus not know anything about vectors. What you just stated is the mathematical formula for a vector, not the artistic formula for a vector. What that other member stated before was the definition of a signature vector, and what I am talking about is the definition of a render vector. What you stated can be applied to art, but you only expanded upon my first statement when I said a vector is a re-coloration process, you just put it in fancied terms, your statement doesn't contradict my knowledge at all. You expressed what a vector is in mathematical terms, while I expressed it in artistic. Here is ( in extreme length) what you said: A vector, as defined above by you, is a specific mathematical structure. It has numerous physical and geometric applications, which result mainly from its ability to represent magnitude and direction simultaneously. Wind, for example, had both a speed and a direction and, hence, is conveniently expressed as a vector. The same can be said of moving objects and forces. The location of a points on a cartesian coordinate plane is usually expressed as an ordered pair (x, y), which is a specific example of a vector. Being a vector, (x, y) has a a certain distance (magnitude) from and angle (direction) relative to the origin (0, 0). Vectors are quite useful in simplifying problems from three-dimensional geometry. In other words, it can be "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid (simplified) colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. " Don't try to shut someone down unless you absolutely know what you are talking about. - Quote:
-
Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Given the fact that this is my first one, I wouldn't be surprised.
Oh dear lord, you make me laugh. XD You absolutely have no idea how vectors work.
I presented you with hard facts. Please lock this topic someone, it has served this purpose. If you wish to continue this debate, pm me.
|
|
|
| |
|
.Sergio
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:03 PM
Post #20
|
- Posts:
- 2,472
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #248,531
- Joined:
- February 6, 2007
|
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 04:58 PM
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 03:56 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 10:02 AM
Unlike steve, you mus not know anything about vectors. What you just stated is the mathematical formula for a vector, not the artistic formula for a vector. What that other member stated before was the definition of a signature vector, and what I am talking about is the definition of a render vector. What you stated can be applied to art, but you only expanded upon my first statement when I said a vector is a re-coloration process, you just put it in fancied terms, your statement doesn't contradict my knowledge at all. You expressed what a vector is in mathematical terms, while I expressed it in artistic. Here is ( in extreme length) what you said: A vector, as defined above by you, is a specific mathematical structure. It has numerous physical and geometric applications, which result mainly from its ability to represent magnitude and direction simultaneously. Wind, for example, had both a speed and a direction and, hence, is conveniently expressed as a vector. The same can be said of moving objects and forces. The location of a points on a cartesian coordinate plane is usually expressed as an ordered pair (x, y), which is a specific example of a vector. Being a vector, (x, y) has a a certain distance (magnitude) from and angle (direction) relative to the origin (0, 0). Vectors are quite useful in simplifying problems from three-dimensional geometry. In other words, it can be "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid (simplified) colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. " Don't try to shut someone down unless you absolutely know what you are talking about. - Quote:
-
Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Given the fact that this is my first one, I wouldn't be surprised.
Oh dear lord, you make me laugh. XD You absolutely have no idea how vectors work.
Obviously.
Lol did you just say that you have no idea about vectors? Anyhow it looks good but the shading has been overdone.
|
|
|
| |
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:05 PM
Post #21
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
- .Sergio
- Jun 29 2007, 04:03 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 04:58 PM
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 03:56 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 10:02 AM
Unlike steve, you mus not know anything about vectors. What you just stated is the mathematical formula for a vector, not the artistic formula for a vector. What that other member stated before was the definition of a signature vector, and what I am talking about is the definition of a render vector. What you stated can be applied to art, but you only expanded upon my first statement when I said a vector is a re-coloration process, you just put it in fancied terms, your statement doesn't contradict my knowledge at all. You expressed what a vector is in mathematical terms, while I expressed it in artistic. Here is ( in extreme length) what you said: A vector, as defined above by you, is a specific mathematical structure. It has numerous physical and geometric applications, which result mainly from its ability to represent magnitude and direction simultaneously. Wind, for example, had both a speed and a direction and, hence, is conveniently expressed as a vector. The same can be said of moving objects and forces. The location of a points on a cartesian coordinate plane is usually expressed as an ordered pair (x, y), which is a specific example of a vector. Being a vector, (x, y) has a a certain distance (magnitude) from and angle (direction) relative to the origin (0, 0). Vectors are quite useful in simplifying problems from three-dimensional geometry. In other words, it can be "a type of recoloring process that is characterized by solid (simplified) colors and a cartoonish, "cel-shaded" appearance. " Don't try to shut someone down unless you absolutely know what you are talking about. - Quote:
-
Oh, and Steve has done much better vector art; he knows a thing or two.
Given the fact that this is my first one, I wouldn't be surprised.
Oh dear lord, you make me laugh. XD You absolutely have no idea how vectors work.
Obviously.
Lol did you just say that you have no idea about vectors? Anyhow it looks good but the shading has been overdone.
Sarcasm.
|
|
|
| |
|
.Sergio
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:06 PM
Post #22
|
- Posts:
- 2,472
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #248,531
- Joined:
- February 6, 2007
|
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:05 PM
Sarcasm.
Well it wasn't very sarcastic. XD
|
|
|
| |
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:07 PM
Post #23
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
- .Sergio
- Jun 29 2007, 04:06 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:05 PM
Sarcasm.
Well it wasn't very sarcastic. XD
Given the fact that it is the internet it is hard to interpret sarcasm with text.
|
|
|
| |
|
Curry
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:08 PM
Post #24
|
- Posts:
- 13,232
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #4,585
- Joined:
- December 27, 2003
- I'm Browsing With
- Safari
|
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 12:07 PM
- .Sergio
- Jun 29 2007, 04:06 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:05 PM
Sarcasm.
Well it wasn't very sarcastic. XD
Given the fact that it is the internet it is hard to interpret sarcasm with text.
Obviously. :rolleyes:
|
|
|
| |
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 12:09 PM
Post #25
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 04:08 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 12:07 PM
- .Sergio
- Jun 29 2007, 04:06 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:05 PM
Sarcasm.
Well it wasn't very sarcastic. XD
Given the fact that it is the internet it is hard to interpret sarcasm with text.
Obviously. :rolleyes:
Am I detecting sarcasm?
|
|
|
| |
|
.Sergio
|
Jun 29 2007, 01:32 PM
Post #26
|
- Posts:
- 2,472
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #248,531
- Joined:
- February 6, 2007
|
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:09 PM
- Vulcan
- Jun 29 2007, 04:08 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 12:07 PM
- .Sergio
- Jun 29 2007, 04:06 PM
- Double Oh Seven
- Jun 29 2007, 05:05 PM
Sarcasm.
Well it wasn't very sarcastic. XD
Given the fact that it is the internet it is hard to interpret sarcasm with text.
Obviously. :rolleyes:
Am I detecting sarcasm?
Given the fact that it is the internet it is hard to interpret sarcasm with text.
|
|
|
| |
|
Double Oh Seven
|
Jun 29 2007, 03:26 PM
Post #27
|
- Posts:
- 247
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #253,751
- Joined:
- February 26, 2007
|
Amen to that. XD
|
|
|
| |
|
Walkure
|
Jun 29 2007, 04:19 PM
Post #28
|
- Posts:
- 4,266
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #222,276
- Joined:
- October 25, 2006
|
- Bry
- Jun 28 2007, 05:38 AM
The shading is too extreme, and the face looks odd.
:hmm:
|
|
|
| |
|
BNB
|
Jul 4 2007, 10:51 PM
Post #29
|
- Posts:
- 55
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #283,917
- Joined:
- July 4, 2007
|
i find its a bit choppy but its chill
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|