| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Disney franchise threatened by Hannah Montana | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 28 2008, 06:28 AM (1,184 Views) | |
| ev. | Apr 28 2008, 06:28 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Upgrade your grey matter, cause it one day it may matter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/business...6ca0&ei=5087%0A Haha, must suck for the kids who look up to her. Should be interesting to see how this will affect the channel. |
![]() |
|
| chezpotato | Apr 28 2008, 07:34 AM Post #2 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Honestly, Disney could probably have a few of their stupid TV shows taken off and it wouldn't hurt them one bit. |
![]() |
|
| phractured | Apr 28 2008, 07:49 AM Post #3 |
|
Kool like Koolaid
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
couldn't have said it better myself |
![]() |
|
| Melancholic | Apr 28 2008, 08:16 AM Post #4 |
|
chiralism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Teh noes? I wasn't aware people that prude still existed...
|
![]() |
|
| lostforwords | Apr 28 2008, 11:58 AM Post #5 |
![]()
i dont even
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
lol It's a bit gross that they're letting a 15 year old pose topless with only a cover on. I'm 15 and I certainly wouldn't do that. But it's up to her what she does. Also, alot of kids do look up to her, but I don't see how posing like that is going to effect them. Would they even see the magazine? And what exactly would it do to them?
|
![]() |
|
| .Danilo | Apr 28 2008, 12:16 PM Post #6 |
![]()
the original pirate
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't think it's much of a deal. I mean, these days kids can see things that are much 'worse' than that simply by turning the tv on or getting on the computer. |
![]() |
|
| Sobriquet. | Apr 28 2008, 01:07 PM Post #7 |
|
robbers and cowards
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Since when to kids who watch the Disney Channel read Vanity Fair o.O |
![]() |
|
| Moonface-ZNR | Apr 28 2008, 01:09 PM Post #8 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can't see it affecting kids, since they surely wouldn't be allowed to buy the magazine in shops, nor would their parents get it for them.
|
![]() |
|
| amnestyplease | Apr 28 2008, 01:36 PM Post #9 |
![]()
tell shannon her crafts are ready
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawl she's like ten dude. fuggin gross. |
![]() |
|
| Journet | Apr 28 2008, 01:52 PM Post #10 |
![]()
This is a place you'll never know...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
She's 15, soon to be 16. She posed for a photo shoot, she apologized and that's the end of it. It's not like Hannah Montana fans are going to start a rebellion because she wanted to make some money.
|
![]() |
|
| Tariq | Apr 28 2008, 02:37 PM Post #11 |
|
may the odds be ever in your favor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I personally think that it's a bit wrong that the photographer wanted that shot. I don't blame Hannah/Miley. The photo is artistic, yes. But the woman/girl in the photo is too young to be displayed in that kind of art. |
![]() |
|
| chezpotato | Apr 28 2008, 02:44 PM Post #12 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
She's covered. |
![]() |
|
| Arianna | Apr 28 2008, 02:55 PM Post #13 |
|
Never settle for a half measure.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's still pretty revealing . However, the people are overreacting. You can't really expect a 15 year old to stay goodie-two-shoes forever, it's her decision whether she wants to pose for a picture like that.
|
![]() |
|
| chezpotato | Apr 28 2008, 03:05 PM Post #14 |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not really, there are many clothes that expose the back and shoulders. |
![]() |
|
| Tariq | Apr 28 2008, 03:09 PM Post #15 |
|
may the odds be ever in your favor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's the fact that what's covering her up are satin bed-sheets. You don't have to be a rocket-engineer to associate satin bed sheets + naked girl into sexual acts. And yeah, she can't be goody-two-shoes forever. I even expect her to do some more adultish things later in here career, but she's too young right now. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Community Chat · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:12 PM Jul 11
|




![]](http://b1.ifrm.com/0/1/0/p601690/pipright.png)



I wasn't aware people that prude still existed...





3:12 PM Jul 11